Twentieth-century philosophy · 1920–2012

Smart

Smart proposes that sensations are brain processes described in another vocabulary, removing the need for a second mental substance or dangling properties.

Smart in a shaded warm-grey editorial portrait, standing informally with a small muted-gold lightning-bolt pin.

John Jamieson Carswell Smart was a British-Australian philosopher who worked across philosophy of mind, science, time, religion and ethics. He became a leading defender of mind-brain identity theory and of act utilitarianism.

MindEthicsKnowledge

The question he enters

The question Smart enters

Could a sensation and a brain process be one event described in two very different ways?
Mind-brain identity theoryMind-brain identity theoryThe view that mental states and events are identical with states and events in the brain.Scientific realismScientific realismThe view that successful scientific theories describe a mind-independent world, including its unobservable features, approximately truthfully.UtilitarianismUtilitarianismThe ethical theory that actions are right when their consequences maximise overall welfare.

The central move

Identify experience with the brain process

Smart argues that reports of sensations can be topic-neutral: they identify what is happening without committing to a separate mental substance. Scientific inquiry may then discover that the event is a brain process, just as lightning is discovered to be an electrical discharge rather than something correlated with one.

Key ideas

Terms that carry the argument.

Type identity theory
The view that kinds of conscious state are identical with kinds of brain process.
Topic-neutral analysis
A way of describing experience by its occurrence and effects without assuming whether its nature is mental or physical.
Nomological danglers
Irreducible mental properties that would sit awkwardly outside an otherwise unified physical account of nature.
Act utilitarianism
The view that each action should be assessed by whether it produces the best consequences available.

Where the view strains

Objections and limits.

Multiple realisability

If the same pain could occur in creatures with very different physical structures, one fixed brain-state identity may be too narrow.

The explanatory gap remains

Discovering a correlation or identity claim may not explain why that process has the felt quality it does.

Sources and routes

Read the work. Follow the argument.

Primary texts

Where to meet the position.

On this site

Continue in a usable resource.

Philosopher Compendium

Agreement is a poor substitute for understanding the move.

Philosophy Lab