Multiple realisability
If the same pain could occur in creatures with very different physical structures, one fixed brain-state identity may be too narrow.
Twentieth-century philosophy · 1920–2012
Smart proposes that sensations are brain processes described in another vocabulary, removing the need for a second mental substance or dangling properties.

John Jamieson Carswell Smart was a British-Australian philosopher who worked across philosophy of mind, science, time, religion and ethics. He became a leading defender of mind-brain identity theory and of act utilitarianism.
The question he enters
Could a sensation and a brain process be one event described in two very different ways?
The central move
Smart argues that reports of sensations can be topic-neutral: they identify what is happening without committing to a separate mental substance. Scientific inquiry may then discover that the event is a brain process, just as lightning is discovered to be an electrical discharge rather than something correlated with one.
Key ideas
Where the view strains
If the same pain could occur in creatures with very different physical structures, one fixed brain-state identity may be too narrow.
Discovering a correlation or identity claim may not explain why that process has the felt quality it does.
Sources and routes
Primary texts
On this site