Rapid duty test / ordinary excuses

Would This Annoy Kant?

False promises, strategic kindness, queue jumping and one murderer. Make your excuses now; the categorical paperwork is on its way.

The argument behind the joke

Kant is not annoyed. That would be too easy.

The title is a joke; the test is not. Could everyone act on your maxim without destroying the practice it exploits? Does it respect another person as a rational end, or treat them merely as a means? Was the right act done from duty, or merely because it paid? Kant's answer about lying to a murderer remains deliberately uncompromising. That is why the case matters: a universal rule may protect moral equality, but it may also become monstrous when its consequences belong to somebody else.

Bad Argument Arena

The exception always knows your name.

Kant at the Door