Critique needs a normative footing
If truth and subjectivity are historically entangled with power, critics ask from where domination can be condemned rather than merely described.
Twentieth-century philosophy · 1926–1984
Foucault traces how institutions and expert practices produce the categories through which people are observed, normalised and invited to understand themselves.

Michel Foucault was a French philosopher and historian whose work examined madness, medicine, prisons, sexuality, knowledge and subject formation. He developed archaeological and genealogical methods for studying how truth practices and relations of power change across history.
The question he enters
What if power works most effectively not by forbidding action, but by producing the standards through which people monitor themselves?
The central move
Foucault rejects a model in which power belongs only to a sovereign who issues commands. Modern power also circulates through observation, examination, classification and norms. These practices produce knowledge and kinds of subject, making people both objects of administration and participants in their own regulation.
Key ideas
Where the view strains
If truth and subjectivity are historically entangled with power, critics ask from where domination can be condemned rather than merely described.
Power's dispersion helps explain subtle control but can make accountable agents, institutions and routes of political change harder to identify.
Sources and routes
Primary texts
On this site