Twentieth-century philosophy · 1926–1984

Michel Foucault

Foucault traces how institutions and expert practices produce the categories through which people are observed, normalised and invited to understand themselves.

Michel Foucault in a shaded warm-grey editorial portrait, speaking with one open hand as a subtle muted-gold light plane catches his bald crown.

Michel Foucault was a French philosopher and historian whose work examined madness, medicine, prisons, sexuality, knowledge and subject formation. He developed archaeological and genealogical methods for studying how truth practices and relations of power change across history.

JusticeKnowledgeAgencyMind

The question he enters

The question Michel Foucault enters

What if power works most effectively not by forbidding action, but by producing the standards through which people monitor themselves?
GenealogyGenealogyA method that traces how concepts and practices emerged historically through changing relations of power.Philosophy of powerPhilosophy of powerThe study of how power operates through institutions, knowledge, social practices and relationships.Historical epistemologyHistorical epistemologyThe study of how standards, categories and practices of knowledge change across history.

The central move

Track power through ordinary practices

Foucault rejects a model in which power belongs only to a sovereign who issues commands. Modern power also circulates through observation, examination, classification and norms. These practices produce knowledge and kinds of subject, making people both objects of administration and participants in their own regulation.

Key ideas

Terms that carry the argument.

Power-knowledge
The mutual formation of knowledge practices and power relations rather than two independent domains.
Discipline
Detailed techniques that organise bodies, space, time and conduct to produce useful and compliant subjects.
Normalisation
The comparison of people against standards that define, measure and correct the normal and abnormal.
Genealogy
A historical method that traces contingent struggles and practices behind categories presented as natural or inevitable.

Where the view strains

Objections and limits.

Critique needs a normative footing

If truth and subjectivity are historically entangled with power, critics ask from where domination can be condemned rather than merely described.

Resistance can become elusive

Power's dispersion helps explain subtle control but can make accountable agents, institutions and routes of political change harder to identify.

Philosopher Compendium

Agreement is a poor substitute for understanding the move.

Philosophy Lab