Contemporary philosophy · 1938–2024

Goldman

Goldman shifts epistemic attention from what a believer can inspect internally to whether the process producing a belief reliably connects it with truth.

Goldman in a shaded warm-grey editorial portrait, checking a wristwatch with a muted-gold case.

Alvin Goldman was an American philosopher and a leading figure in post-war epistemology. He developed causal and reliabilist accounts of knowledge and justification, then extended epistemic evaluation to testimony, institutions, media, expertise and collective practices.

KnowledgeAgency

The question he enters

The question Goldman enters

Could a belief be justified because of how reliably it was formed even when the believer cannot explain that process?
ReliabilismReliabilismThe analysis of knowledge as a true belief produced by a process that reliably forms true beliefs.Social epistemologySocial epistemologyThe study of how testimony, trust, institutions and collective practices shape knowledge.Analytic philosophyAnalytic philosophyA tradition that emphasises clear argument, careful distinctions and the analysis of language or concepts.

The central move

Evaluate the route to belief

Goldman's process reliabilism asks whether a belief-forming method tends to produce true beliefs in relevant conditions. This externalist shift allows perception and memory to yield justification without demanding reflective access to every reason, and it opens social institutions to evaluation by their truth-conduciveness.

Key ideas

Terms that carry the argument.

Process reliabilism
A belief is justified when it results from a process that reliably produces true rather than false beliefs.
Causal theory of knowing
Knowledge requires an appropriate causal connection between the fact known and the believer's true belief.
Epistemic externalism
Justification may depend on truth-conducive features of a process that are not accessible from the believer's own perspective.
Social epistemology
The evaluation and design of interpersonal and institutional practices according to their effects on knowledge and error.

Where the view strains

Objections and limits.

Reliable by which description?

A belief-forming process can be typed narrowly or broadly, changing the evidence about whether it is reliable.

Truth-conduciveness is not the only value

Institutions may produce true beliefs while distributing credibility, access or risk unjustly.

Sources and routes

Read the work. Follow the argument.

Primary texts

Where to meet the position.

On this site

Continue in a usable resource.

Philosopher Compendium

Agreement is a poor substitute for understanding the move.

Philosophy Lab