Rules can collide with catastrophe
Strict duties, especially truthfulness, can appear to require material cooperation with terrible consequences.
Modern philosophy · 1724–1804
Kant asks what rational agents must demand of themselves, treating persons as law-makers who may never be reduced to convenient instruments.

Immanuel Kant was a Prussian philosopher who spent his working life in Königsberg. His critical philosophy transformed debates about the limits of knowledge, the authority of moral duty, political right and aesthetic judgement.
The question he enters
Could you will the principle behind your action as a rule for everyone—and does it respect each person as an end?
The central move
Kant shifts moral attention from the outcome a person hopes for to the principle on which they act. A good will acts from duty under a law rational agents can share. The humanity formulation adds a second pressure: never treat rational nature merely as a means, even when doing so would produce an attractive result.
Key ideas
Where the view strains
Strict duties, especially truthfulness, can appear to require material cooperation with terrible consequences.
A person may describe an action narrowly enough to make universalisation look easier than it is.
Sources and routes
Primary texts
On this site