Violence risks becoming self-justifying
Fanon's account of anti-colonial violence is disputed where catharsis, necessity and political strategy are allowed to blur.
Twentieth-century philosophy · 1925–1961
Fanon analyses colonialism as a system that occupies land, language, embodiment and self-understanding, making liberation both political and psychological.

Frantz Fanon was a Martinican psychiatrist, writer and revolutionary who worked in Algeria during the anti-colonial struggle. Drawing on phenomenology, psychiatry and political theory, he examined racialisation, colonial violence, national culture and the unfinished work of decolonisation.
The question he enters
How can a person recognise themselves when a colonial world has already assigned their body a hostile meaning?
The central move
Fanon shows that race is not merely an idea held by prejudiced individuals. Colonial institutions, language and violence impose meanings on bodies and possibilities, producing psychological injury alongside political domination. Decolonisation must therefore transform both material structures and the forms of selfhood they generate.
Key ideas
Where the view strains
Fanon's account of anti-colonial violence is disputed where catharsis, necessity and political strategy are allowed to blur.
Feminist critics have challenged his treatment of women, sexuality and the gendered structure of colonial experience.
Sources and routes
Primary texts