Early modern philosophy · 1711–1776

David Hume

Hume asks human reason to account for its habits, showing how causation, self and morality depend on practices that argument alone cannot manufacture.

Hume in a shaded warm-grey editorial portrait, holding a two-pronged muted-gold tuning fork.

David Hume was a Scottish Enlightenment philosopher, historian and essayist. His empiricism and scepticism reshaped debates about causation, personal identity, religion and the sources of moral judgement.

KnowledgeEthicsAgency

The question he enters

The question David Hume enters

How much of what you call knowledge is a rational proof—and how much is a well-trained expectation?
EmpiricismEmpiricismThe view that knowledge is grounded primarily in sensory experience.ScepticismScepticismThe view or method of doubting whether knowledge is possible in some area.Moral sentimentalismMoral sentimentalismThe view that moral judgement is grounded importantly in human sentiments or emotions.

The central move

Trace the idea back to experience

Hume distinguishes relations of ideas from matters of fact and asks what experience could justify our concepts. We observe one event followed by another, not a necessary connection floating between them. Custom carries expectation forward. His scepticism is therefore both disruptive and naturalistic: humans keep reasoning, but with less metaphysical swagger.

Key ideas

Terms that carry the argument.

Hume's fork
The distinction between demonstrable relations of ideas and contingent matters of fact.
The problem of induction
Past regularity cannot non-circularly prove that unobserved cases or the future will resemble it.
Bundle theory
Introspection reveals changing perceptions but no separately observed, enduring self that owns them.
Moral sentiment
Moral judgement depends on human feeling and shared points of view, not reason operating alone.

Where the view strains

Objections and limits.

Can natural habit count as justification?

Explaining why people expect the future to resemble the past does not by itself show that the expectation is rationally warranted.

Whose shared sentiment?

An appeal to common feeling must explain prejudice, disagreement and the social training of sympathy.

Sources and routes

Read the work. Follow the argument.

Philosopher Compendium

Agreement is a poor substitute for understanding the move.

Philosophy Lab