Twentieth-century philosophy · 1900–1976

Ryle

Ryle argues that the mind is not a ghostly object hidden inside the body, but is revealed in the organisation of intelligent conduct and capacities.

Ryle in a shaded warm-grey editorial portrait, holding a long muted-gold drafting compass securely beside his hip.

Gilbert Ryle was a British analytic philosopher and a leading figure in Oxford ordinary language philosophy. He is best known for attacking Cartesian pictures of mind and for analysing mental concepts through dispositions, abilities and patterns of behaviour.

MindKnowledgeAgency

The question he enters

The question Ryle enters

What if looking for the mind inside the body is like touring a university and then asking where the university itself is?
Ordinary language philosophyOrdinary language philosophyAn approach that clarifies philosophical problems by examining how words function in everyday use.Philosophy of mindPhilosophy of mindThe study of consciousness, mental states and their relationship to bodies and the physical world.Analytic philosophyAnalytic philosophyA tradition that emphasises clear argument, careful distinctions and the analysis of language or concepts.

The central move

Expose the category mistake

Ryle argues that treating the mind as an extra thing alongside the body misclassifies mental concepts. To attribute intelligence, belief or character is often to describe what someone can do, how they respond and the patterns their conduct displays, not to report a private mechanism behind the action.

Key ideas

Terms that carry the argument.

Category mistake
An error that treats something as belonging to a logical type different from the one in which it actually functions.
Ghost in the machine
Ryle's critical label for the Cartesian picture of an immaterial mind directing a mechanical body.
Dispositions
Tendencies and capacities expressed across suitable circumstances rather than hidden episodes observed only from within.
Knowing how
Intelligent practical ability that cannot always be reduced to first possessing and consulting propositions.

Where the view strains

Objections and limits.

Experience seems left over

An account of dispositions and behaviour may not capture what pain, colour or thought feels like from the first-person point of view.

Inner causes still matter

Neuroscience and cognitive explanation investigate mechanisms that behavioural competence alone does not identify.

Sources and routes

Read the work. Follow the argument.

Philosopher Compendium

Agreement is a poor substitute for understanding the move.

Philosophy Lab