Early modern philosophy · 1685–1753

George Berkeley

Berkeley argues that material substance adds nothing intelligible to the ideas we perceive, recasting ordinary objects as mind-dependent without calling them imaginary.

Berkeley in a shaded warm-grey editorial portrait, gesturing in episcopal dress with one muted-gold ring.

George Berkeley was an Irish philosopher and Anglican bishop associated with early-modern empiricism. He defended immaterialism: the view that ordinary objects are collections of ideas rather than mind-independent material substances.

KnowledgeMind

The question he enters

The question George Berkeley enters

If everything you know of an object is given in experience, what work is an unknowable material substance doing?
EmpiricismEmpiricismThe view that knowledge is grounded primarily in sensory experience.IdealismIdealismThe view that reality, or our knowledge of it, is fundamentally dependent on mind or ideas.Philosophy of perceptionPhilosophy of perceptionThe study of how sensory experience represents the world and can justify beliefs about it.

The central move

Remove the material support nobody can perceive

Berkeley accepts an empiricist starting point and turns it against materialism. Sensible objects are collections of ideas perceived by minds; to exist as such an object is to be perceived. He retains a stable world through finite spirits and God's perception, rather than reducing reality to one person's private imagination.

Key ideas

Terms that carry the argument.

Immaterialism
The denial that mind-independent material substance is needed to explain ordinary sensible objects.
Esse est percipi
For sensible things, to be is to be perceived; their existence is not an inaccessible material layer behind experience.
Ideas and spirits
Passive ideas are perceived; active minds or spirits perceive and will.
Master argument
An attempt to show that conceiving an unconceived sensible object covertly makes it an object of thought.

Where the view strains

Objections and limits.

Is God carrying too much explanatory weight?

The continuity and order of the world depend heavily on Berkeley's theism.

Conceivable is not the same as perceived

Critics argue that thinking about an unperceived object does not show the object could not exist without being thought about.

Philosopher Compendium

Agreement is a poor substitute for understanding the move.

Philosophy Lab