Not every emotion is a judgement
Startle, mood and bodily affect may arise before or without the propositional evaluations the theory emphasises.
Contemporary philosophy · 1942–2007
Solomon treats emotions as intelligent, evaluative ways of engaging with the world rather than forces that simply happen to a passive self.

Robert Solomon was an American philosopher and teacher whose work connected existentialism, emotion, ethics and business life. He defended the view that emotions involve judgements and strategies through which people interpret their situations and take responsibility for a life.
The question he enters
What if anger is not a burst that overtakes judgement, but a judgement about insult, responsibility and your place in a relationship?
The central move
Solomon rejects a hydraulic picture in which passions erupt against reason. Emotions are structured by evaluations of what matters, by concepts and by social roles. Because those judgements can be examined and revised, emotional life is connected with responsibility without being reduced to voluntary choice at every moment.
Key ideas
Where the view strains
Startle, mood and bodily affect may arise before or without the propositional evaluations the theory emphasises.
Trauma, illness and social conditioning constrain emotional patterns, so treating emotion as chosen can slide into blame for what is not readily controllable.
Sources and routes
Primary texts