Contemporary philosophy · 1942–2007

Robert C. Solomon

Solomon treats emotions as intelligent, evaluative ways of engaging with the world rather than forces that simply happen to a passive self.

Robert C. Solomon in a shaded warm-grey editorial portrait, teaching with two lively gestures and one muted-gold cufflink.

Robert Solomon was an American philosopher and teacher whose work connected existentialism, emotion, ethics and business life. He defended the view that emotions involve judgements and strategies through which people interpret their situations and take responsibility for a life.

MindEthicsAgency

The question he enters

The question Robert C. Solomon enters

What if anger is not a burst that overtakes judgement, but a judgement about insult, responsibility and your place in a relationship?
Philosophy of emotionPhilosophy of emotionThe study of the nature, rationality and value of emotions in thought and action.ExistentialismExistentialismThe tradition that stresses freedom, responsibility and self-creation rather than a fixed human essence.Business ethicsBusiness ethicsThe study of moral responsibilities in commerce, organisations, work and economic decision-making.

The central move

Give emotions their intelligence back

Solomon rejects a hydraulic picture in which passions erupt against reason. Emotions are structured by evaluations of what matters, by concepts and by social roles. Because those judgements can be examined and revised, emotional life is connected with responsibility without being reduced to voluntary choice at every moment.

Key ideas

Terms that carry the argument.

Emotions as judgements
Emotions disclose evaluative interpretations of a situation rather than standing apart from thought.
Myth of the passions
The misleading picture of emotions as alien forces that overwhelm an otherwise rational and passive self.
Emotional responsibility
The claim that people can cultivate, criticise and sometimes be answerable for patterns of emotional interpretation.
Existential self-making
Character and meaning are formed through situated commitments, interpretations and passions rather than discovered as fixed essences.

Where the view strains

Objections and limits.

Not every emotion is a judgement

Startle, mood and bodily affect may arise before or without the propositional evaluations the theory emphasises.

Responsibility can become unfair

Trauma, illness and social conditioning constrain emotional patterns, so treating emotion as chosen can slide into blame for what is not readily controllable.

Sources and routes

Read the work. Follow the argument.

Primary texts

Where to meet the position.

Philosopher Compendium

Agreement is a poor substitute for understanding the move.

Philosophy Lab