Late antique philosophy · 354–430

Augustine

Augustine explains evil as a corruption of good produced by disordered willing, not as a rival substance created by God.

Augustine in a shaded warm-grey editorial portrait, opening one hand while wearing a muted-gold stole and cradling a closed book.

Augustine of Hippo was a North African Christian bishop, theologian and philosopher born in Thagaste in Roman Numidia. His writings on will, time, memory, evil, grace and political community profoundly shaped Latin Christian and medieval thought.

EthicsAgencyMind

The question he enters

The question Augustine enters

If everything that exists comes from a good creator, what kind of thing can evil be?
Christian philosophyChristian philosophyPhilosophical inquiry conducted within, or in sustained engagement with, Christian beliefs and concepts.NeoplatonismNeoplatonismA later Platonist tradition describing reality as a hierarchy flowing from the One and returning through intellect and contemplation.Philosophy of religionPhilosophy of religionThe rational study of religious concepts, arguments, experiences and practices.

The central move

Treat evil as a failure of good

Augustine denies that evil is a positive substance competing with God. Evil is privation: damage, disorder or the absence of a good that ought to be present. Moral evil arises when created wills turn from higher goods towards lower goods in the wrong order.

Key ideas

Terms that carry the argument.

Privation of good
Evil is a lack, corruption or disorder in something that is good insofar as it exists.
Disordered love
Moral failure occurs when finite goods are loved in the wrong order or as if they were ultimate.
Free will
Created agents can turn away from the good, making moral evil attributable to misuse of will rather than divine creation.
Interior self
Memory, attention and self-examination disclose a divided will and a depth not captured by outward behaviour alone.

Where the view strains

Objections and limits.

Natural suffering is not chosen

Privation and free will do not straightforwardly explain earthquakes, disease or severe suffering experienced by those who did not cause it.

Foreknowledge and grace complicate freedom

Divine knowledge, providence and dependence on grace create pressure on the claim that created agents are fully responsible for turning away.

Philosopher Compendium

Agreement is a poor substitute for understanding the move.

Philosophy Lab