Real histories are not clean
Conquest, exclusion, inheritance and unequal bargaining power make just acquisition and adequate rectification extremely demanding.
Contemporary philosophy · 1938–2002
Nozick argues that justice concerns how holdings were acquired and transferred, not whether the final distribution matches a preferred social pattern.

Robert Nozick was an American philosopher who taught at Harvard University. Anarchy, State, and Utopia defended individual rights and the minimal state in a direct challenge to redistributive theories of justice.
The question he enters
If every exchange was voluntary and every holding justly acquired, what authorises the state to rearrange the result?
The central move
Nozick rejects patterned principles that continually compare who has how much. An unequal distribution can be just when it arose through just acquisition and voluntary transfer; a tidy pattern can be unjust when it ignores theft or coercion. Individual rights operate as side constraints on what may be done for social goals.
Key ideas
Where the view strains
Conquest, exclusion, inheritance and unequal bargaining power make just acquisition and adequate rectification extremely demanding.
A transfer may be voluntary in a narrow sense while poverty sharply constrains the options available.
Sources and routes
Primary texts
On this site