Contemporary philosophy · 1938–2002

Robert Nozick

Nozick argues that justice concerns how holdings were acquired and transferred, not whether the final distribution matches a preferred social pattern.

Robert Nozick transfers one token between open hands along a single muted-gold path.

Robert Nozick was an American philosopher who taught at Harvard University. Anarchy, State, and Utopia defended individual rights and the minimal state in a direct challenge to redistributive theories of justice.

JusticeAgency

The question he enters

The question Robert Nozick enters

If every exchange was voluntary and every holding justly acquired, what authorises the state to rearrange the result?
Political philosophyPolitical philosophyThe study of justice, authority, rights, freedom and the proper organisation of political life.LibertarianismLibertarianismA political view giving strong priority to individual liberty, property rights and protection from coercion.Entitlement theoryEntitlement theoryNozick's view that holdings are just when they arise through just acquisition, transfer and rectification.

The central move

Give the distribution a history

Nozick rejects patterned principles that continually compare who has how much. An unequal distribution can be just when it arose through just acquisition and voluntary transfer; a tidy pattern can be unjust when it ignores theft or coercion. Individual rights operate as side constraints on what may be done for social goals.

Key ideas

Terms that carry the argument.

Entitlement theory
Justice in holdings depends on acquisition, voluntary transfer and rectification of past injustice.
Side constraints
Rights limit how individuals may be used even for beneficial collective ends.
Wilt Chamberlain argument
Voluntary exchanges will disrupt any fixed distribution, so preserving a pattern requires repeated interference.
Minimal state
A state restricted chiefly to protecting people against force, theft, fraud and breach of contract.

Where the view strains

Objections and limits.

Real histories are not clean

Conquest, exclusion, inheritance and unequal bargaining power make just acquisition and adequate rectification extremely demanding.

Formal choice can hide material dependence

A transfer may be voluntary in a narrow sense while poverty sharply constrains the options available.

Philosopher Compendium

Agreement is a poor substitute for understanding the move.

Philosophy Lab