Probabilities depend on disputed inputs
Priors, simplicity measures and likelihoods in cosmic explanation are difficult to assign without building controversial assumptions into the result.
Contemporary philosophy · 1934–
Swinburne builds a cumulative probabilistic case for God, arguing that one simple personal explanation can make a wide range of features of the world more likely.

Richard Swinburne is a British philosopher of religion known for systematic defences of theism, substance dualism and Christian doctrine. He applies probabilistic and explanatory reasoning to cosmology, natural order, consciousness, religious experience, evil and divine attributes.
The question he enters
Can several individually inconclusive clues become strong evidence when one simple hypothesis explains them together?
The central move
Swinburne does not present one deductive proof of God. He asks whether theism increases the probability of a universe governed by simple laws, containing conscious moral agents and religious experience. Using Bayesian structure, he argues that theism is a simple personal explanation whose combined evidence can outweigh each argument's weakness in isolation.
Key ideas
Where the view strains
Priors, simplicity measures and likelihoods in cosmic explanation are difficult to assign without building controversial assumptions into the result.
The extent and distribution of suffering may be far less likely under perfect goodness than Swinburne's appeals to freedom and soul-making allow.
Sources and routes
Primary texts