Commitment can shield irrationality
Emphasising subjective appropriation risks allowing intensity to substitute for evidence or ethical accountability.
Nineteenth-century philosophy · 1813–1855
Kierkegaard resists living by abstraction, asking how a particular person becomes responsible for commitments no system can make on their behalf.

Søren Kierkegaard was a Danish philosopher and religious writer who published both signed works and texts under carefully constructed pseudonyms. His writing explored anxiety, despair, faith, love, choice and the difficulty of becoming a self before God.
The question he enters
What can objective evidence decide when the question is how you will exist and what you will commit yourself to?
The central move
Kierkegaard distinguishes possessing true information from relating oneself truthfully to a claim that reorganises a life. Ethical and religious commitment cannot be outsourced to a system or crowd. The issue is not that evidence is irrelevant, but that no detached proof can perform the individual's task of choosing and becoming.
Key ideas
Where the view strains
Emphasising subjective appropriation risks allowing intensity to substitute for evidence or ethical accountability.
Different works stage incompatible voices, so statements by a pseudonymous author cannot automatically be treated as Kierkegaard's final doctrine.
Sources and routes
Primary texts