Deterrence can instrumentalise offenders
Using punishment to influence others risks treating the punished person mainly as a means to public security.
Enlightenment philosophy · 1738–1794
Beccaria measures punishment by public necessity, demanding clear laws, proportionate penalties and the abolition of torture and unnecessary death.

Cesare Beccaria was an Italian Enlightenment thinker and legal reformer associated with the Milanese Academy of Fists. His short treatise On Crimes and Punishments attacked arbitrary justice, torture and capital punishment while grounding penal authority in law, prevention and the least necessary harm.
The question he enters
If punishment is justified by preventing harm, why should greater cruelty make it more legitimate?
The central move
Beccaria argues that citizens surrender only the minimum liberty needed for common security. Punishment must therefore be fixed by public law, proportionate to offences and directed towards prevention rather than vengeance. Certainty and promptness deter more effectively than spectacular severity.
Key ideas
Where the view strains
Using punishment to influence others risks treating the punished person mainly as a means to public security.
Social harm, culpability, need and unequal impact can point towards different rankings of offences and penalties.
Sources and routes
Primary texts
On this site