First-person concern may resist reduction
Even if identity facts reduce to continuity, people may reasonably care whether one numerically identical subject survives.
Contemporary philosophy · 1942–2017
Parfit argues that personal identity may matter less than the psychological relations that connect lives across time.

Derek Parfit was a British philosopher whose work transformed debates about personal identity, future generations, reasons and moral theory. Through tightly constructed thought experiments, he argued that identity is not always determinate and that morality must take seriously people whose existence depends on our choices.
The question he enters
If your psychology divided perfectly between two future people, what would be lost when neither was strictly identical with you?
The central move
Parfit treats persons as constituted by physical and psychological continuities rather than by a further indivisible self. In branching cases, identity may fail to be one-to-one while memory, intention and character continue. This suggests that what prudentially matters can survive even when the question 'which future person is me?' has no single answer.
Key ideas
Where the view strains
Even if identity facts reduce to continuity, people may reasonably care whether one numerically identical subject survives.
Impartial aggregation can lead towards the repugnant conclusion or other choices that conflict with strong intuitions about lives and equality.
Sources and routes
Primary texts
On this site